Is smartphone tracking a less intrusive reward for good behaviour or just a way to enrich the incarceration industry?
I n 2018, William Frederick Keck III pleaded guilty in a court in Mission Virginia, to possession with intent to distribute cannabis. He served three months in prison, then began a three-year probation. He was required to wear a GPS ankle monitor before his trial and then to report for random drug tests after his release. Eventually, the state reduced his level of monitoring to scheduled meetings with his parole officer. Finally, after continued good behaviour, Keck’s parole officer moved him to Virginia’s lowest level of monitoring: an app on his smartphone. Read More